Header Image (book)


Thursday, September 25, 2014

Recommended Reading

See The Great Unraveling (New York Times, September 15, 2014).

Full essay below the fold in case you don't have a digital subscription to the New York Times:
It was the time of unraveling. Long afterward, in the ruins, people asked: How could it happen?

It was a time of beheadings. With a left-handed sawing motion, against a desert backdrop, in bright sunlight, a Muslim with a British accent cut off the heads of two American journalists and a British aid worker. The jihadi seemed comfortable in his work, unhurried. His victims were broken. Terror is theater. Burning skyscrapers, severed heads: The terrorist takes movie images of unbearable lightness and gives them weight enough to embed themselves in the psyche.

It was a time of aggression. The leader of the largest nation on earth pronounced his country encircled, even humiliated. He annexed part of a neighboring country, the first such act in Europe since 1945, and stirred up a war on further land he coveted. His surrogates shot down a civilian passenger plane. The victims, many of them Europeans, were left to rot in the sun for days. He denied any part in the violence, like a puppeteer denying that his puppets’ movements have any connection to his. He invoked the law the better to trample on it. He invoked history the better to turn it into farce. He reminded humankind that the idiom fascism knows best is untruth so grotesque it begets unreason.

It was a time of breakup. The most successful union in history, forged on an island in the North Sea in 1707, headed toward possible dissolution — not because it had failed (refugees from across the seas still clamored to get into it), nor even because of new hatreds between its peoples. The northernmost citizens were bored. They were disgruntled. They were irked, in some insidious way, by the south and its moneyed capital, an emblem to them of globalization and inequality. They imagined they had to control their National Health Service in order to save it even though they already controlled it through devolution and might well have less money for its preservation (not that it was threatened in the first place) as an independent state. The fact that the currency, the debt, the revenue, the defense, the solvency and the European Union membership of such a newborn state were all in doubt did not appear to weigh much on a decision driven by emotion, by urges, by a longing to be heard in the modern cacophony — and to heck with the day after. If all else failed, oil would come to the rescue (unless somebody else owned it or it just ran out).

It was a time of weakness. The most powerful nation on earth was tired of far-flung wars, its will and treasury depleted by absence of victory. An ungrateful world could damn well police itself. The nation had bridges to build and education systems to fix. Civil wars between Arabs could fester. Enemies might even kill other enemies, a low-cost gain. Middle Eastern borders could fade; they were artificial colonial lines on a map. Shiite could battle Sunni, and Sunni Shiite, there was no stopping them. Like Europe’s decades-long religious wars, these wars had to run their course. The nation’s leader mockingly derided his own “wan, diffident, professorial” approach to the world, implying he was none of these things, even if he gave that appearance. He set objectives for which he had no plan. He made commitments he did not keep. In the way of the world these things were noticed. Enemies probed. Allies were neglected, until they were needed to face the decapitators who talked of a Caliphate and called themselves a state. Words like “strength” and “resolve” returned to the leader’s vocabulary. But the world was already adrift, unmoored by the retreat of its ordering power. The rule book had been ripped up.

It was a time of hatred. Anti-Semitic slogans were heard in the land that invented industrialized mass murder for Europe’s Jews. Frightened European Jews removed mezuzahs from their homes. Europe’s Muslims felt the ugly backlash from the depravity of the decapitators, who were adept at Facebooking their message. The fabric of society frayed. Democracy looked quaint or outmoded beside new authoritarianisms. Politicians, haunted by their incapacity, played on the fears of their populations, who were device-distracted or under device-driven stress. Dystopia was a vogue word, like utopia in the 20th century. The great rising nations of vast populations held the fate of the world in their hands but hardly seemed to care.

It was a time of fever. People in West Africa bled from the eyes.

It was a time of disorientation. Nobody connected the dots or read Kipling on life’s few certainties: “The Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire / And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire.”

Until it was too late and people could see the Great Unraveling for what it was and what it had wrought.


  1. I have the feeling that the only History to be found in the future may be the finding of writings of microbloggers, much as Josephus gave us insight into the History of his time.

    1. Or the way Saint-Simon revealed the decadent character of the court of Louis XIV?

  2. Maybe this history won't be written, if only because a people consumed with their own survival will have little inclination to read it.

    1. Recall the Planet of the Apes - in one of them he finds the statute of Liberty half buried. When the Star Men come down from somewhere, maybe they will find something.

  3. o/t - I found this... something you might appreciate.

    1. Joe,
      I will be posting that video next week.

    2. Calla Fayte said

      An excellent video. Something to bookmark and refer to again and again.

  4. People, paradigms, boxes.

    Humans are indeed a very strange species.

  5. I think this is more a matter of pandering or someone needing a column and having nothing than it is informative.

    Let's look at this:

    Breakup? The Scottish referendum was a great example of democracy. And they will receive some relief from austerity. An austerity which is much more indicative of the breakup of society than the vote.

    Aggression? This is something new? Notice: This is the way the world goes 'round. It is also worth noting that Putin is far from achieving anything like his goals. Of course Ukraine remains a broken country that is still a pawn in the great game.

    Hatred? The Gazans suffer hideous bombings and a few anti Jewish slogans get scrawled on buildings in Europe and we are supposed to sympathize with Likud's supporters? There is hatred all right but the columnists focus is misplaced.

    Weakness? I'm not sure what he was saying but this stooge was undoubtedly talking out of the other side of his mouth during the WMD grift.
    One man gathers what another man spills. Time for this cheap little poltroon to learn it.

    Beheadings? Well they do know that it's a visual world and the person who controls the images controls the culture.
    Whether this will ultimately work in their favor is not currently known but we do that Americans will be too manipulated by the videos to discuss root causes.

    Fevere? Ebola isn't new and the upside of this horrid event is extensive news of progress toward a vaccine. It will be available to Americans for the appropriate market fee, I'm sure. The West Africans might have to wait.

    Disorientation? Well, let's have some good news. The kids in Colorado who walked out and demanded that they be given The truth.
    I get a kick out the fringe right bemoaning kids standing up for themselves.
    And another cop gets to skip for shooting an unarmed black man in Ohio. It seems we are very clear about what needs to be done about scary black men. Same as scary Muslims.

    Great unraveling or business as usual?
    I read that Sisi is in town asking for more weapons. Any doubt he gets them?

    Don't it drag on and don't columns like this keep it so dumbed down.

    1. Duck,
      It's commentary -- not a news article.

      It seems to me that the author found "his voice" as well as "the voice" of many others.

  6. Lord H,
    Those who are interested can Google search Roger Cohen for themselves.

    Some here may find this interesting: In Defense of Murdoch, By ROGER COHEN, Published: July 11, 2011.

  7. Oh, gad, a quasi-liberal goes slightly off their plantation and someone goes half-cocked in underplaying the points and the value of the piece. tsk tsk tsk

    1. Well, AOW, it's still just some guy who was blocked and needed a quick column.

      There is evil in the world. There is aggression. Nothing new and certainly not the start of any unraveling.

      Just why the right wishes to see the end times absolutely baffles me.
      The right doesn't seem comfortable without a view of the apocalypse.

    2. No more money in the bank!
      No cute baby we could spank!
      What to do about it?
      Let's turn out the lights, and go to sleep.

  8. What transpires at other blogs is of no interest to this blog. Therefore, blog-gossip comments are deleted.


We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:
1. Any use of profanity or abusive language
2. Off topic comments and spam
3. Use of personal invective

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.