Silverfiddle Rant! |
I have a very-limited understanding based on cursory perusal of some CRT articles and one book. This post won't explain it to you. I will provide here a few links to things written by CRT partisans and some quotations from those sources.
First up, a 'Splainer from the splainiest splainers of the progressive left, Vox. They lament the fact that CRT has morphed into a catchall category, one used by Republicans who want to ban anti-racist teachings and trainings in classrooms and workplaces across the country.
Critical race theory emerged in law schools in the 1970s and ’80s as an alternative to the mainstream discourse and classes on civil rights law, many of which held that the best way to fight racial discrimination was to enact legal reforms.The Vox article tracks with the book, Critical Race Theory, An Introduction, by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. From the book:
Critical race theorists...posited that racism is endemic and institutionalized in the United States.
The group was skeptical of legal theories that supported colorblindness, objectivity, and neutrality
Every analysis of the law should be grounded in historical context, arguing that “racism has contributed to all contemporary manifestations of group advantage and disadvantage along racial lines, including differences in income, imprisonment, health, housing, education, political representation, and military service.”
Critical race theory acknowledges, values, and centers the knowledge of people of color who experience racism daily.
Critical race theory is “interdisciplinary and eclectic,” meaning it borrowed from a number of traditions like feminism, Marxism, and critical legal theory.
“The interests of all people of color necessarily require not just adjustments within the established hierarchies, but a challenge to hierarchy itself.”
The critical race theory (CRT) movement is a collection of activists and scholars interested in studying and transforming the relationship among race, racism, and power.The book's introduction lists several CRT propositions:
Unlike traditional civil rights, which embraces incrementalism and step-by-step progress, critical race theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.
It also draws from certain European philosophers and theorists, such as Antonio Gramsci and Jacques Derrida, as well as from the American radical tradition exemplified by such figures as Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Cesar Chavez, Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Black Power and Chicano movements of the sixties and early seventies.
Racism is ordinary, not aberrational—“normal science,” the usual way society does business, the common, everyday experience of most people of color in this country.
Most would agree that our system of white-over-color ascendancy serves important purposes, both psychic and material.
Race and races are products of social thought and relations. Not objective, inherent, or fixed, they correspond to no biological or genetic reality; rather, races are categories that society invents, manipulates, or retires when convenient.
IntersectionalityThe voice-of-color thesis holds that because of their different histories and experiences with oppression, black, Indian, Asian, and Latino/a writers and thinkers may be able to communicate to their white counterparts matters that the whites are unlikely to know. Minority status, in other words, brings with it a presumed competence to speak about race and racism.