• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above). • Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death. • Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death. • Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death. • A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death. • A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death. • A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death. • A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old. • Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251). • A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more. • A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce. • A man can beat his wife for insubordination. • Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman. • A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s). • A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's. • A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits. • A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval). • A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative. • Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal. • Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam. • The list goes on.
Will someone please explain to me why some, so called, "LIBERALS" seem to tolerate and even embrace those among us who, by their religious [sic] conviction, advocate this $#!t . One, in particular, who frequently comments here comes to mind.
There is no explanation for the ignorance that so many adhere to. Yet these same people are more than ready to give up our rights in the name of protecting us from " them".
There should be no excuse for not knowing about this, but look at those who vote for Obama, how a man-on-the street interview shows their complete ignorance on all major events. But ask them about dancing with the stars, or any of the 'reality' shows and they can answer all your questions.
Debbie Right Truth http://www.righttruth.typepad.com
Obama imposes a clear and present danger upon the people of the United States, on several fronts, in fact, but no where is this more noticeable than the DOJ’s intent to prosecute as a violation of civil rights, anyone who dares exercise their first amendment right to express an opinion about Islam. This is a clear subverson of the U. S. Constitution, and must not stand.
Conservatives On Fire, Thank for the link to the essay by Victor Davis Hanson.
The last two paragraphs of that essay and something that the multiculturalists willfully ignore:
That is a prescription for cultural suicide, if not by beheading or by a pressure cooker full of ball bearings, at least by making the West into something that no one would find very different from his homeland.
Is not that the ultimate paradox: The solution to the sort of violence we saw in Britain and Sweden the past week, or to the endless acrimony over “comprehensive immigration reform,” is that the Western hosts will so accede to multiculturalism that the West will be no longer unique — and therefore no longer a uniquely desirable refuge for its present legions of schizophrenic admiring critics. If the immigrant from Oaxaca can recreate Oaxaca in Tulare, or the Pakistani second-generation British subject can carve out Sharia in the London boroughs, or a suburb of Stockholm is to be like in one in Damascus, then would there be any reason to flee to Tulare, London, or Stockholm?
Jon, Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that shari'a law is not compatible with the principles found in our Constitution and in various other elements of our rule of civil law.
Now, I realize that some Moslems pick and choose as to which aspects of shari'a law they will observe. In such cases, are these Moslems really practicing Islam or something else?
FT, I don't see the West at all willing or ready to take those steps.
One Islam gets a toehold in any nation, does that nation ever take Draconian steps?
Well, perhaps Spain did all those centuries ago. Today, we are still nattering on about all the injustices of La Reconquista. But suppose that La Reconquista had never occurred?
How interesting it is to observe how most Americans are lining up for one or the other of these possibilities: to accept the false god, thereby condemning themselves to hell for all eternity, or to have their throats slit open.
Robert Sinclair, spoken like a true religious fanatic. So. What makes you different in your fanaticism from that of Muslims?
Not talking about differences in beliefs or behavior here, just fanaticism. What makes your god real and theirs therefor false? Why should your hateful, punishment inflicting god be real and their hateful, punishment inflicting god not real?
You self-righteous exponents of hateful credos are all in the same bag, not one of you can see beyond your own need to hate others.
Islam is indeed a horrible death cult, and Christianity, such as it is, is preferable to Islam. That is no excuse for any follower of any faith to be an exclusionary fanatic.
Hey Dog$#!t, You missed the point, unless you actually think that Sharia Law is a good thing. If that's the case you are either one-of-them or a complete psycho. Which is it?
We took a horse/buggy "fiacre" in Vienna through a park where the entrance had a statue of Eugene, who freed the Viennese from the Turks years ago; the driver of the fiacre turned around as he gave us that part of the history, looked at us, and said "but it didn't work...they're baaaack." People have tried to rid themselves of the curse, but....
I still say that if moslems would march in the millions against terrorism, something good might happen; but only then. And even then, how do we TRUST?
...Unlike the last edition of the publication in March, which contained bomb-building recipes – including one using a pressure cooker, similar to the devices deployed near the marathon finish line – and other suggested methods for inflicting small-scale terrorism, the new 39-page issue has numerous pieces aimed at the American audience.
[...]
The gleeful tone extends to the tornado that struck Moore, Okla., on May 20, with an article on that disaster saying, “The Oklahoma tornado took lives, destroyed properties, and still nations, Muslims and others alike, celebrated and prayed for more to strike America. They love to see America in calamities!”...
You are revolting -- and completely out of order. Your exhibition of latent homosexual tendencies ill becomes you. Please get back in the closet you crept out of, and leave us decent people in peace.
We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion: 1. Any use of profanity or abusive language 2. Off topic comments and spam 3. Use of personal invective
According to Sharia law:
ReplyDelete• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.
Will someone please explain to me why some, so called, "LIBERALS" seem to tolerate and even embrace those among us who, by their religious [sic] conviction, advocate this $#!t . One, in particular, who frequently comments here comes to mind.
Victor Davis Hansen has a recent peice called "Western Cultural Suicide"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/30/western_cultural_suicide__118603.html
There is no explanation for the ignorance that so many adhere to. Yet these same people are more than ready to give up our rights in the name of protecting us from " them".
ReplyDeleteThere should be no excuse for not knowing about this, but look at those who vote for Obama, how a man-on-the street interview shows their complete ignorance on all major events. But ask them about dancing with the stars, or any of the 'reality' shows and they can answer all your questions.
ReplyDeleteDebbie
Right Truth
http://www.righttruth.typepad.com
Obama imposes a clear and present danger upon the people of the United States, on several fronts, in fact, but no where is this more noticeable than the DOJ’s intent to prosecute as a violation of civil rights, anyone who dares exercise their first amendment right to express an opinion about Islam. This is a clear subverson of the U. S. Constitution, and must not stand.
ReplyDeleteConservatives On Fire,
ReplyDeleteThank for the link to the essay by Victor Davis Hanson.
The last two paragraphs of that essay and something that the multiculturalists willfully ignore:
That is a prescription for cultural suicide, if not by beheading or by a pressure cooker full of ball bearings, at least by making the West into something that no one would find very different from his homeland.
Is not that the ultimate paradox: The solution to the sort of violence we saw in Britain and Sweden the past week, or to the endless acrimony over “comprehensive immigration reform,” is that the Western hosts will so accede to multiculturalism that the West will be no longer unique — and therefore no longer a uniquely desirable refuge for its present legions of schizophrenic admiring critics. If the immigrant from Oaxaca can recreate Oaxaca in Tulare, or the Pakistani second-generation British subject can carve out Sharia in the London boroughs, or a suburb of Stockholm is to be like in one in Damascus, then would there be any reason to flee to Tulare, London, or Stockholm?
Jon,
ReplyDeleteAnyone with half a brain should be able to see that shari'a law is not compatible with the principles found in our Constitution and in various other elements of our rule of civil law.
Now, I realize that some Moslems pick and choose as to which aspects of shari'a law they will observe. In such cases, are these Moslems really practicing Islam or something else?
Debbie,
ReplyDeleteask them about dancing with the stars, or any of the 'reality' shows and they can answer all your questions
Or ask them which new apps they have for their iPhones, and you'll get a dissertation. Sheesh.
I'm sorry to be so redundant, but for twelve years I have, have had and will have NOTHING to say about the presence of Islam in the West but this:
ReplyDeleteDIDADIN
Detain
Intern
Disempower
And
Deport
Islamaniacs
Now
D-I-D-A-D-I-N!
Those who would be kind to the cruel are sure to be cruel to the kind."
"Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809)
DIDADIN!
Either we adopt this admittedly Draconian policy, or our identity as a people and as a nation will DIE.
DIDADIN!
FT,
ReplyDeleteI don't see the West at all willing or ready to take those steps.
One Islam gets a toehold in any nation, does that nation ever take Draconian steps?
Well, perhaps Spain did all those centuries ago. Today, we are still nattering on about all the injustices of La Reconquista. But suppose that La Reconquista had never occurred?
There is nothing about Islam to recommend it to any enlightened society.
ReplyDeleteSam,
ReplyDeleteI will touch upon that matter in my post on Monday.
Can we stop the DOJ at this point?
RT,
ReplyDelete" But ask them about dancing with the stars, or any of the 'reality' shows and they can answer all your questions."
NEWS FLASH-STOP THE PRESS!
"Angus T. Jones To Be Replaced By Girl On 'Two & A Half Men'!
cultural suicide indeed AOW..have an awesome weekend dear friend :)
ReplyDeleteHow interesting it is to observe how most Americans are lining up for one or the other of these possibilities: to accept the false god, thereby condemning themselves to hell for all eternity, or to have their throats slit open.
ReplyDeleteI won't be in either of those two lines.
Sharia law=one damned good reason to own firearms--LOT'S of firearms!!!!
ReplyDeleteAlong with cases of ammo and huge magazines!
Robert Sinclair, spoken like a true religious fanatic. So. What makes you different in your fanaticism from that of Muslims?
ReplyDeleteNot talking about differences in beliefs or behavior here, just fanaticism. What makes your god real and theirs therefor false? Why should your hateful, punishment inflicting god be real and their hateful, punishment inflicting god not real?
You self-righteous exponents of hateful credos are all in the same bag, not one of you can see beyond your own need to hate others.
Islam is indeed a horrible death cult, and Christianity, such as it is, is preferable to Islam. That is no excuse for any follower of any faith to be an exclusionary fanatic.
Hey Dog$#!t, You missed the point, unless you actually think that Sharia Law is a good thing. If that's the case you are either one-of-them or a complete psycho. Which is it?
ReplyDeleteWe took a horse/buggy "fiacre" in Vienna through a park where the entrance had a statue of Eugene, who freed the Viennese from the Turks years ago; the driver of the fiacre turned around as he gave us that part of the history, looked at us, and said "but it didn't work...they're baaaack."
ReplyDeletePeople have tried to rid themselves of the curse, but....
I still say that if moslems would march in the millions against terrorism, something good might happen; but only then. And even then, how do we TRUST?
Al Qaeda propaganda mag crows about Boston and London attacks, urges more:
ReplyDelete...Unlike the last edition of the publication in March, which contained bomb-building recipes – including one using a pressure cooker, similar to the devices deployed near the marathon finish line – and other suggested methods for inflicting small-scale terrorism, the new 39-page issue has numerous pieces aimed at the American audience.
[...]
The gleeful tone extends to the tornado that struck Moore, Okla., on May 20, with an article on that disaster saying, “The Oklahoma tornado took lives, destroyed properties, and still nations, Muslims and others alike, celebrated and prayed for more to strike America. They love to see America in calamities!”...
Mr. Sinclair,
ReplyDeleteYou are revolting -- and completely out of order. Your exhibition of latent homosexual tendencies ill becomes you. Please get back in the closet you crept out of, and leave us decent people in peace.
------------> Katharine Heartburn
I really hate videos like this. Not the message, but the splash of words in every direction. It's distracting. Much easier to just listen to.
ReplyDelete