Header Image (book)

aowheader.3.2.gif

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Final 2016 Presidential Debate

The third and last 2016 Presidential Debate will be broadcast live tonight from the University of Nevada in Las Vegas @ 9:00 P.M., EDT.

Does this final debate really matter?

It might if there are actually undecided voters at this point — and if the mainstream media disseminated the following information 24/7 (hat tip to Virtual Mirage for the video below):


LL of Virtual Mirage reminds us of the following:
When WikiLeaks first went on-line and published information that damaged the Bush Administration, liberals cheered loudly. Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, was a hero. They're not cheering now...
Read the rest HERE.

Pastorius of Infidel Bloggers Alliance informs us:
The Washington Post has not mentioned that Hillary and her people conspired to delete emails and have them scrubbed from her servers AFTER a Federal Subpoena. They have only reported on Wikileaks that were not so damaging to Hillary.

The Washington Post and the rest of the MSM are trying to bury the incredibly damaging Wikileaks by ignoring them and colluding in an anti-Trump "Pussy" campaign.
Read the rest HERE.



And there's this, which includes the RSVP guest list: Podesta Held Dinners For Reporters Who Would Be Covering Clinton.

Will you be watching the final Presidential debate, in part or in whole?

I haven't decided whether or not I want to spend time and energy watching any more of this election's political theater.

53 comments:

  1. I won't be watching. I can catch it all tomorrow morning at a time more convenient for me. At this juncture, I don't know of anybody who is trying to decide between Clinton, Trump or Johnson.....so I'm not sure how large a population exists, where this debate will sway any votes. Tonight is nothing more than political theater and cheap theatric stunts, and tomorrow will have each side crowing that they "won"....whatever that even means.

    I haven't heard much from Clinton, but Trump doesn't seem to be doing much more than feeding the news spin....instead of trying to appeal to demographics he's suffering horribly in. Odd strategy.

    - CI

    ReplyDelete
  2. The very fact that this old sick lying murdering woman is even running for president says it all. In a country of 330 million people and all the dems can come up with is her? Give me a break.

    I will watch the debate in hopes that Clinton will have a seizure. My opinion is everyone has made up their minds who they are voting for and that decision was made quite awhile ago. Indeed - I made my decision when Trump rode down that escalator on June 16th. As Ed said, it's just political Kubuki theater now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And when was the last time you saw a presidential candidate who didn't campaign?

      Delete
    2. Maybe Calvin Coolidge, affectionately known as "Silent Cal," who when asked to lead the Republican party of his time, said, "I do not choose to run."

      I love Cal Coolidge. I think was a "real cool dude" to used today's language.

      Do you know what he said after his term in office was over when some reporter asked what he thought his greatest accomplishment as president was?

      "I minded my own business," was all he said.

      How could you not love a politician like that? };^)>

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    4. "I will watch the debate in hopes that Clinton will have a seizure."

      DITTO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    5. Miss Pittypat said

      I just ADORED that anecdote about Calvin Coolidge, FT.

      I wanted you to know that I got your point in sharing it.

      FYI: I've always thought Grace Coolidge was an exceptionally lucky woman. I'll bet those two had a whale of a good time between the sheets! Still waters run deep, you know.

      Cheerio!

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  3. I have already cast my ballot for Mr. Trump, but I wouldn't miss tonight's show for anything, even if I have to drink a whole pot of coffee to stay awake and ruin any chance of getting any sleep tonight.

    Why? Because I love to observe real life characters in action and then study the media's and the public's reaction to their performance. I believe we can learn more about Reality from proceedings such as these than we possibly could from the undoubtedly biased, agenda-driven "reportage" we are sure to get through instant, post-debate analysis, and so-called news reports loaded with cherry-picked sound bites the next day.

    ONE of these people is going to be our next president. No matter which one it may be, I don't believe we could possibly learn enough about their character –– or lack thereof –– by getting our news second hand.

    We may not have any real power as citizens thanks to the machinations of anti-Constitution,anti-Liberty, anti-American, Marxist-Leftist-Progressive-Liberal-Socialist-Statist-D'Rat bastards , but if we are to keep hope alive at all, the following words from Rousseau might be helpful:

    “As soon as any man says of the affairs of the State ’What does it matter to me?’ the State may be given up for lost.”

    ~ Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'll just be getting off work when the debate starts.

    Some very interesting stuff from James O'Keef and Project Veritas.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Warren,
      Have you seen this?

      Democratic Operative In Veritas Video About Voter Fraud Visited The White House 342 Times

      47 of those visits were direct visits with Obama. Several of those visits included Michelle Obama.

      In the video where Democratic operatives talk about how to conduct mass voter fraud, Scott Foval describes him in the videos as the ‘black hat’ guy who has taught him so much.

      Creamer states on video that Clinton is aware of his work, and that his firm, Democracy Partners, has a daily telephone call with the Clinton campaign to coordinate.

      AND THEN THERE'S THIS:

      Activist Who Took Credit For Violent Chicago Protests That Injured Cops And Trump Supporters Was On Hillary Clinton’s Payroll

      Delete
    2. None of this matters; the media covers for them. We get upset, we see this information and know how all Americans SHOULD know it, but alas.......
      no stories stick...only anti-Republican stories. Check out the Yahoo Home page some day...watch CNN for five minutes.
      It's over

      Delete
    3. The only voter fraud that weasel O'Keefe has uncovered is his own.

      Pure hysteria.

      Delete
    4. Weasel? I have no idea.

      But even if he IS, he could be spot on this time.

      Delete
    5. Nostradumbass thinks O'Keef is a weasel because he does this new thing called "investigative journalism" where you infiltrate criminal groups then record them on video bragging and incriminating themselves. Real shady stuff, don't you think?

      Next thing you know the FBI will be doing some of this newfangled investigative stuff.

      Sorry about your hysteria, Nostradumbass. Maybe if you try imagining some "Progressive" bag men jumping over prison walls it will calm you down.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  5. Trump could crush her in the debate and it end with her having a medical emergency and the the progressive propagandists in the Infotainment Media Complex would spin it all her way.

    Trump's quip about her being in jail (a great and effective line) sent the Leftwing I Scream Machine into overdrive to paint him as a vindictive dictator, when his comments were in the context of a special prosecutor.

    I'm sick of it all, and I've suspected for years that was the whole goal of the leftwing globalists: So disgust us that we turn away and they can get on with dismantling the nation out from under us and selling the scrap to corporate globalists...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wouldn't miss it.

    Trump will probably double down and go completely unhinged.

    Question now is completely down ticket. Will Trumps negatives carry over and give Dems a boost in close races.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why not? It's sure to be the best show on TV tonight.

      Delete
  8. Replies
    1. Why not? It's sure to be the best show n TV tonight.

      Delete
    2. Having early dinner with a friend but it should be fun at the restaurant because they have TVs up in the bar and I know I'll hear reactions from the drinkers!
      I may tune in the last 30 minutes but I have found the candidates classless, mean, and bellicose. That's the word! BELLICOSE...I hate the whole thing.

      Delete
  9. How was that Bus supposed to know that the shit they dumped was contaminated, when
    the shit wasn't marked with the letter "C" when it came out of Hillary's body. So how would she have known it was contaminated?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it came out of HER body, we KNOW it had to be toxic –– like everything else about that b-tch.

      Delete
    2. Her diaper was full. They had to do something with all that excrement.

      Delete
  10. HEADLINES TODAY at Lucianne.com News Forum Home Page:


    Scandals surround Clinton´s
    gatekeeper at State Department


    Catching up with Hillary's hit man

    Undercover video shows Democrats admitting
    they hire agitators for Trump events


    We kind of figured that out.

    Exclusive: FBI Agents Say Comey ‘Stood In The Way’ Of
    Clinton Email Investigation


    At last, people are beginning to talk.

    Our Neutron Bomb Election

    Remember the Neutron promise? Buildings standing,
    people missing. Brace for it.


    Dem Operative Who Oversaw Trump Rally
    Agitators Visited White House 342 Times


    Sounds like he had a regular job there.

    Wikileaks: Clinton Staffers Scramble After
    Report Of Bill’s New Mistress

    There's a never ending supply.

    Newsgate 2016

    Now you'll know whom to ignore.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'll watch, I think there are STILL things to come out. It's blatantly plain the MSM is in the tank for Clinton, but since the moderator is from Fox, there might actually be some pointed questions and follow-ups for the first time.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I will watch. Wallace may be a better and more objective moderator than the prior ones. I am not convinced that Hillary is going to win, and this last debate may have an impact on the election.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I believe Chris Wallace will go out of his way to show HOW FAIR HE IS and, therefore, will be much harder on Trump....it's the typical situation the Left's put anything "FOX" in ...If they act at all Conservative (echoing the leftwing bias exhibited in most NBC and CNN moderators), they're labeled, insulted, and belittled.

    ReplyDelete
  14. He almost made it.

    Then he has to hint that he won't accept
    the election results.
    Just Donald being Donald.

    Too bad. He was more composed than usual but Clinton just kept on with the short jabs till he blew.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The way you people on the Left sedulously, brazenly and unabashedly apply the DOUBLE STANDARD in virtually every attempt you make to ovulate or adjudicate all things political is so outrageously blatant it downright comical, Canardo.

      CUT IT OUT! No one with even a minimal amount of intelligence is buying your absurd CRAP anymore.

      Delete
  15. From Who CARES if Trump refuses to accept the election result?

    Democrats have already accepted a rigged result.

    Ed Rendell (D) former governor of PA has already questioned PA vote results PUBLICLY.

    A Trump refusal to accept the election result (especially if it finished out with a 3-7%) result as it seems likely today would make him a Burr like pariah with a then RUINED brand, name and future.

    And being a politician how many believe HRC would not say in a Florida 2000 finish, that Putin rigged the final result and get the backing of “17 intelligence agencies” (calling Mike ‘I changed the CIA analysis of Benghazi to a video and now oppose Trump’ Morell)?

    How MANY TIMES in our history has a nominee called the opponent a ‘puppet’ of foreign powers?

    The MSM has controlled the question being Trump’s refusal rather than Clinton’s
    .

    ReplyDelete
  16. MY REVIEW OF THE THIRD DEBATE

    APPEARANCE

    HE: pale, haggard, rumpled, frowzy, subdued, a bit grim

    SHE: Spritely, confident, rested, crisp, well-dressed, beautifully coiffed, perfectly made up, highly professional, almost attractive, but arrogant

    STYLE

    HE: Semi-articulate, limited vocabulary, poor syntax, common "Noo Yawk" guttersnipe accent unfortunate, but may help him appear to be "one of the folk."

    SHE: Bright, glib, formulaic, overly-calculated, brazen and palpably insincere. Her normally harsh Midwestern twang seemed less abrasive than usual. I suspect she's been taking elocution lessons from a top Hollywood drama coach.

    SUBSTANCE

    HE: Restrained, en pointe (focused), but shambling verbal style, defensive, hangdog aura, works against him. Makes many excellent points, but does it poorly

    SHE: Never gives actual answers, responds instead with warmed over segments from campaign speeches, and artfully contrived sound bites. Overall she appears militantly mendacious, truculent, and smug. Worse she perpetually filibusters like an automaton who cannot be stopped till it has finished its scientifically-engineered routine

    MODERATOR

    Chris Wallace was the clear “winner” of the evening. He was fair, kind-but-impartial, considerate, but excellent at keeping the candidates moving along on track without seeming rude or agenda-driven. BRAVO, Chris Wallace!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FT,
      Frowzy? I didn't notice that at all.

      HRC ought to look perfect. She's been "resting."

      Delete
    2. I thought he looked as though he'd slept in his clothes. At any rate, HIS appearance was no match for HERS. I have to give the Devil his due, and somehow SHE managed to look almost BEAUTIFUL last night.

      I lied them BOTH at the Al Smith Annual Dinner last night.

      If only they would behave like THAT on the campaign trail, current events might be less of a migraine headache.

      The ENEMEDIA, of curse, dod NTHING but try to find Fault.

      I hope GOD DAMNs ALL OF THEM TO HELL.

      Delete
    3. FT,
      I honestly didn't notice any rumpled clothes. I did notice that Trump looked weary.

      Hillary looked her best. No doubt about it.

      Delete
  17. On a Hot, Open mike in last nights interview with Democratic liar Donna Brazile After Megyn Kelly Grilled Her about giving the questions to Hillary in the second debate, when she tried SO HARD to change the subject but Megyn Kelly wouldn't let her Donna Brazile, nasty last remark to her was "GO TO RUSSIA!"

    But the cat got out of the bag, Donna Brazile DID give Hillary some of the question in advance at prior to the second debate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. but it really doesn't matter...the Left wins every time. All they have to say is "I did NOT do that" and the media leaves it alone. Kelly was horrid last night to the Trump surrogates, but showed the same toughness to Brazile, thank goodness.....Am not sure the Left's used to actually having THEIR dishonesties and faults exposed and, now that it's happening, they just say "No it didn't happen" and all the leftwing media follows suit.
      Watch CNN ANY time of day....it's only GET TRUMP...no mention of Wikileak emails EXCEPT to suggest Russia wants Trump to win! It's all KILL THE MESSENGER with the Left...it gets America off the subject. "Don't LOOK at the emails, don't realize the AUDIO SHOWS THE TRUTH....just KILL THE MESSENGER!"

      Scary, but I think some Americans, even non Conservatives, are FINALLY getting it, waking up, etc.

      Delete
    3. Z,
      Kelly was horrid last night to the Trump surrogates

      So I heard from Mr. AOW when I got up this morning. I didn't stay up late last night to watch the post-debate pundits. I have to get up too early in the morning to stay up to listen to that portion.

      I'm sick of Megyn Kelly. She grates on my nerves. She didn't used to, but she does now -- for several reasons, not the least of which is her apparent desire to play to "show biz."

      The Big Three Media are doing their best to ignore anything that might harm HRC.

      Delete
  18. Bless you Always,

    You are one of the finest people in what is left of this nation. I hope your pain eases.

    Michael

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael! How are you, my dear friend?

      Are you still on Skype? I don't sign in often -- typically for only an hour on Fridays, when I co-host The Gathering Storm Radio Show.

      Thank you for your kind words. They mean a lot to me.

      Delete
  19. From Former Attorney General: ‘Quid Pro Quo’ On Clinton’s Emails Was Illegal:

    “Offering a public official a benefit in return for the public official making a concession of some kind is illegal,” Ashcroft said in an interview Tuesday on Fox Business Network.

    “And not only is it illegal if you’re asking a public official to do something illegal, it can be bribery if you offer a public official an incentive, a benefit, in order to do something that is legal,” he added.


    Evidently, merely making the offer is illegal in and of itself.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I noticed this because I myself am not confident about descending stairs since I've been felled by this kidney trouble....

    VIDEO: Camera cuts away as Hillary starts to descend stairs without railing.

    Watch the video all the way to the end, and see those few seconds on anxiety as HRC begins to descend the stairs.

    HRC is a sick old woman. And she's having balance problems -- perhaps vision issues, too (depth perception).

    ReplyDelete
  21. I’m voting for Trump because Hillary is not in any way an option and it will take someone bold, gutsy, and maybe a little crazy, to get things back on track. And if you believe that the Clintons who have been in government their whole lives can earn 150 million dollars without being crooks then you’re too stupid to vote.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Is this true (Madonna's offer to Hillary voters)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently yes, –– if one can believe headlines that appear at the DRUDGE REPORT.

      Delete
    2. FT,
      It might be an HPV risk. Likely, IMO.

      Delete
  23. I think that someone needs to duc tape that pie hole in Hillary's face!
    Clinton divulged Top Secret nuclear security intelligence to tens of millions of worldwide television audience viewers Wednesday night during the third presidential debate, according to high-ranking Department of Defense personnel.
    Clinton, responding to opponent Donald Trump and a question posed by debate moderator Chris Wallace, boasted specific and “damaging” details about the United States’ nuclear response time to retaliate during a nuclear attack.

    Hillary Clinton Should Be Arrested For Leaking Top Secret Nuclear Intelligence on National TV, another liberal idiot who should be in jail instead of running for president

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:
1. Any use of profanity or abusive language
2. Off topic comments and spam
3. Use of personal invective

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

!--BLOCKING--