Header Image (book)

aowheader.3.2.gif

Monday, January 15, 2018

TPS: Taxpayers Pendejos Siempre

These two stories piss me off.

President Orders 200,000 Salvadorans to Leave US

Trump Administration Sends Haiti Earthquake Victims Home

We are a Generous Nation

We shelter the poor and unfortunate and give billions to help people around the world. We offer “temporary protection,” and instead of being thanked, we are assaulted with howls of indignation and condemnation when someone in the Trump Administration announces the program is ending and the people need to go  home.

* 60,000 Haitians reside here temporarily because of an earthquake in 2010.

* 200,000 Salvadorans have resided here temporarily since 2001!

“Temporary”
programs with durations of eight years and 18 years! I didn't spend 18 years in my parents' home I grew up in.

Only dysfunctional DC could produce such pathos-drenched cluster-kludge kabuki over a "crisis" provoked by a "temporary" program ending. Most "refugees" and protected status individual snuck in here illegally and skipped over multiple nations to get here. Mexico's not good enough? Sly operatives in the Government-sponsored Human Trafficking Complex knew they could put on the puppy dog eyes via the Infotainment Media Complex to play on our sympathies when it came time for these poor unfortunates to go.

This is a grotesque, operatic abuse of the generosity of taxpaying Americans. 

If we can’t send people back home after 18 years of a temporary program, when can we? Why not be honest and say, “Never!”

When will the Isle of Perpetual Misery known as Haiti ever be recovered enough to send these people home? By definition, “Never.”

The 200,000 Salvadorans here have produced 192,000 American citizens...

...the first wave of whom are becoming eligible to vote. Who’s up for deporting the parents of these US citizens?

Progressive pick-pockets are inviting guests to expensive banquets at our expense, branding them with Democrat party logos, and lapping up the votes. 

This. Must. End.
No more bringing people into this nation to create little anchor citizens. When disaster strikes in a foreign land, we roll in, create camps with food, clean water, sanitary facilities and even schools for the displaced children. We feed and house them safely and humanely and even help rebuild devastated communities.

No more US-sponsored Hunger Games where we reward the survivors who treck across multiple nations to break our borders and live an un-earned existence as a de facto self-made US citizen.

It is also time for some harsh fact-facing

Mexico and Central America are lands of many blessings, but they are ravaged by official corruption and criminal gangs. The United States must be a partner in helping our neighbors to the south, but we must also stop being the safety valve. At some point, people in those lands need to get their shit together, demand more from their governments and clean up their act.

We have to end this cynical game played by progressives and globalists. Immigration, yes! But on our terms, not dictated by heartstring-plucking exploiters, political criminals and cynical manipulators.

Think I’m being cruel? 
Read this story and weep. US Government bungling has created in the leafy neighborhoods of this nation the heartbreaking scenario of Central American immigrant families menaced by the very gangs they thought they had escaped.

Welcome to America.

48 comments:

  1. Those countries are filled with minorities. You must really hate brown people!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Dems want TPS to continue forevermore. This is about creating a voting bloc, not giving "temporary" assistance.

    So, the government shuts down on Friday. I don't see this contentious Congress coming up with a deal that the POTUS will accept? Will the POTUS blink and legalize all the DACAs?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Durbin,
    Those shithole countries will never improve themselves as long as the too-generous United States of America remains their safety valve (as Silverfiddle stated in the body of this blog post).

    ReplyDelete
  4. The elephant in the room: the DACAs and the illegals impact on the taxpayer-funded public schools systems. See the last link in the body of Silverfiddle's blog post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I now live in a small Western PA community. Amish and Mennonite are in abundance. One of the so called "Refugee re-location" groups has chosen this area to do their dump. I just read in the local newspaper that 2500 new children had entered the school system this year. Most don't speak English. Mission accomplished apparently.

      Delete
    2. Make America Brown Again said

      Apparently you don't like "Diversity" do you, Bunkerville?

      What a shame! That's what made America great in the first place, isn't it?

      Delete
    3. We were an agrarian society with lots of land and basic manufacturing up the kazoo... we needed brawn not brains last time the push was on for imigrants.. The U.S. has moved on...diversity has nothing to do with it...but first lets fix our cities and their problems first with jobs jobs jobs and education reform then talk diversity.

      Delete
  5. Autherine ("I Love") Lucy said

    The world will never fulfill the great promise Mother Nature intended until all peoples, all nations, all geographical locations abandon outmoded tradition and the archaic religions that spark hatred, violence and bitter division.

    When that has finally been acheved all elements could then be united and function as One World indivisible with Social Justice and Equality of Outcome for All.

    Anyone who is agains this is nothing but a wicked troglodyte as well as a fool.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Make America Brown Again sid

      You forgot to add "racist" to your list.

      Delete
  6. Glad you characterized the country specifically as shitholes. For it is the geographic, NOT the people.

    Something Trump seemed to overlook. He has a habit of doing that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When disaster strikes in a foreign land, we roll in, create camps with food, clean water, sanitary facilities and even schools for the displaced children.

    -------------
    Just like we have in Puerto Rico, Yemen, Nicaragua and others.
    We care about Hillary's silly e-mails but not about what the Clinton Foundation did to Haiti.
    Our hands are not entirely clean.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Autherine ("I Love") Lucy said

      Atta boy, Comrade! You keep telling it like it isn't often enough, and sure as DJT said "sh-thole" they'll eventually beieve you.

      Bitch till you win, and I'll back you all the way.

      Delete
    2. It is obvious what we/they have been doing in the past is not working. These poor countries seem to be slipping further behind.

      Related, why is the Dominican Republic not as miserable as Haiti? They share the island of Hispaniola.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Once can cite many factors: Environment, culture, government, weather would be just a few.

      Delete
  8. I'll repeat perhaps the most salient point of my overly-long screed:

    The 200,000 Salvadorans here have produced 192,000 American citizens...

    That, my friends, is why Democrats don't mind blowing up the DACA/Immigration deal.

    Yeah, taxpayers will be mad at them, but the millions of illegal immigrants and "temporary" people here are creating "Permanent Citizens" indoctrinated to vote Democrat and agitate for untrammeled entry for their confreres left behind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SF,
      I'll repeat perhaps the most salient point of my overly-long screed:

      The 200,000 Salvadorans here have produced 192,000 American citizens...


      Thanks for reiterating! That is indeed the most salient point of your blog post.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Make America Brown Again said

      So what are you implying, Fiddle? Do you want to demand that all would be refugees submit to sterilization before we can give them sanctguary? If so, how much more racist could you get?

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. facts do indeed "carry implications and ramifications." Unfortunately, political debate in this country smothers, obfuscates and twists them.

      What is the difference between Dreamers and DACA?

      Do we have a good idea of the size and socio-economic profile of the cohort in question?

      Do we know how many people are here illegally?

      Did you know about half the Reagan Amnesty recipients never became citizens (apparently, they were satisfied with coming out of the shadows and having a permanent visa allowing them to come and go as they please)

      What does it mean to be a citizen today, given cheap travel "home," large ethic communities and US government and civil groups encouraging you to hold on to your native language and culture, and home country media streaming into immigrant homes?

      Should we even grant citizenship to Mexicans? Or should permanent entry/exit visa be the most we grant them?

      Do you know that Mexicans granted US citizenship can hold on to their Mexican ID cards and travel home to vote in Mexican elections as a Mexican citizen?

      Is this a conflict?

      I don't say this as a slight to any nationality, but as with practically every subject that comes up, we are not having the right conversation.

      You cannot make fact-based decisions when you cannot even stipulate what the facts are.

      My prediction? No wall, no worker verification, no end to chain migration. Extra border patrol agents and nobody gets deported. And for the people who are her, I don't see that as a bad thing, but it will guarantee the Hunger Games Make Yourself an American bonanza for human traffickers and the taxpayer funded multi-billion dollar Immigration Services and Assistance Cartel will continue.

      Delete
  9. We wouldn't have this problem if we annexed other countries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The resulting demographics would electorally swamp the Repubelicans and guarantee Progressive Democrat dominance forever.

      A modern day impolitic Churchill would perhaps suggest some form of 21st Century imperialism that force the sh*tholes to get their act together.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. When we annexed California we "got their shit together" for them until they ran out of gold.

      Delete
    4. They're still chugging along on the fumes of Thatcherite "other people's money," but your point is well taken.

      California has the highest poverty rate of all the states. California is home to 1/3 of all poor people in the nation and their poverty rate of 12% is twice that of the national average.

      I'll leave it to one of the white supremacist neonazi racists to point out how immigrants fit into that picture.

      Delete
  10. I'm confused. Dems scream bloody murder when Trump accurately describes Haiti as a "sh#thole" then insist we can't send temporary refugees home because Haiti is a "sh#thole."

    There never should have been a "temporary" program like this anyway. Everyone knows there is nothing "temporary" about ANY government program. But I do feel for the people who were relocated here and would now be sent back.

    Frankly, I'd let the "temporary" folks stay if Dems agreed to end all such programs and preferences for poor illiterates in future immigration but they have have absolutely REFUSED to do so. They WANT another generation of dependents even if that takes away resources from the poor and minorities who are U.S. citizens.

    Someone needs to distribute bumper stickers in the black community "Dems Care More for Immigrants from El Salvador Than They do African Americans." Get that message to the voters!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Mike,
      Dems scream bloody murder when Trump accurately describes Haiti as a "sh#thole" then insist we can't send temporary refugees home because Haiti is a "sh#thole."

      Spot on!

      Delete
    3. I agree, Mike.

      An exchange you suggest would be great, but we all know a Democrat promise = a roll of toilet paper, and not cushy Charmin, but the ultra-thin military stuff you can see through.

      Delete
    4. "Dems Care More for Immigrants from El Salvador Than They do African Americans."
      --------
      And Repubs don't give two warm farts in hell about either.

      Delete
  11. The Town Crier sad

    Time to Repeal the Disastrous 1965 Immigration Act

    American Thinker,

    by Selwyn Duke

    Question: If someone sells you on something with false advertising and it does the exact opposite of what was promised, are you not entitled to return the product and get a refund? In fact, if the product caused you harm, should you not in addition be compensated for damages? Consider that when Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) was pushing the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 (S.500) on the Senate floor, he said, "First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually." Actually, he was right. We now absorb more than a million immigrants annually. Kennedy next stated, "Under . . .

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why haven't some crafty constitutionalists plotted a legal attack on the twisted legal interpretation that has resulted in "anchor babies?

    We are one of the few nations on the planet still stupid enough to have birthright citizenship.

    ReplyDelete
  13. In case anyone thinks I am a mean racist, I stated my position here back in September:

    Grant permanent legal status to DACA people in exchange for
    * End chain migration
    * Nation-wide worker verification system
    * Verification system for all forms of public assistance
    * Five year moratorium on immigration
    * Build the damned wall!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd agree on nos. 1,2,3.
      4 is too extreme.
      5 is strictly kabuki for Rollo.

      Delete
    2. Clearly at least some of your proposals seem reasonable to a broad range of dispositions, so it's hard to understand how progress has been so slow. If there are partisans on one or both sides blocking widely supported measures like these, why? 4 is the only one I would vehemently oppose. I guess 2 is unpopular with business doners. 3 might cost more than it saves, but you could argue that it's worth it to reduce migration (would be interesting to see if it did in practice). 5 would obviously cost more than it saves, if it were value for money Donald wouldn't have gone on about how someone else was going to pay for it...

      Delete
    3. Jez, Repubelicons and DemonCraps both benefit from illegal immigration. It is a human rights abuse: Cheap labor and propaganda puppets, which is why I maintain we must legalize those who are law abiding and only deport those with criminal records.

      This only works if we have firm new measures in place to discourage future illegal entrance.

      #4 - Moratorium would be to catch our breaths and work on getting people already here assimilated and fully integrated into American life.

      5 - The Wall was--I hate to agree with Ducky--"kabuki for Rollo." I always saw it as shorthand for better border protections (You can't build a wall on a river, for instance), so beefed-up smarter border protection would satisfy me.

      Actually, the best border protection is bribing--er--paying the Mexican government for "Security Assistance" and they protect our border from their side.

      Delete
    4. Donkey Hotay ssid

      If we don't get that wall ,we don't get NUTTIN, but more of the same ol' crap.

      Ain't nutting else to say that makes sense

      Delete
    5. SF: I'm all for paying more attention to working with current immigrants and getting them assimilated, but when you call for a moratorium it just makes me think immediately of all the exceptions I'd want to make. Smart border protections and cooperation with Mexico sounds a lot more productive than a literal wall.

      Delete
    6. Ed, I don't think military service should be the only criteria, but I do think military service should confer automatic citizenship.

      Delete
  14. Watch this video and pay attention to the Quote at the end!

    This is why Jack was assigned to push up Daisies

    And, yes, it is relevant to this topic!

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1, 2, & 3 as is.

    4, compromise - 3 years.

    5, ditch the wall and spend the money on bridge repair.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:
1. Any use of profanity or abusive language
2. Off topic comments and spam
3. Use of personal invective

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

!--BLOCKING--