Header Image (book)

aowheader.3.2.gif

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

The Final Days Of The Obama Administration

Obama certainly has been busy wielding executive power as January 20, 2017 gets closer! See AS THE WORM TURNS: Obama's Last Destruction In Office at Stogie's site Saber Point.

And here's something else to add to the list in the above link....

Note: the title of the video below is deceptive. The video actually discusses yet another federal land grab in Western states by using (abusing) the Antiquities Act of 1906 :


More environmental lunacy...EPA To Alaskans In Sub-Zero Temps: Stop Burning Wood To Keep Warm.

Then, there's this: White House fails to make case that Russian hackers tampered with election: US issued JAR billed itself as an indictment that would prove Russian involvement.

And this (hat tip to Bunkerville): EPA targets key ingredient in pizza, bread in latest eleventh-hour rule. Note that:
...The EPA is issuing the proposed rule because of a lawsuit it lost in federal court brought by the Sierra Club, claiming that the rule from the 1990s needed to be updated under the Clean Air Act.


Summary of this administration's final days:

25 comments:

  1. This impossibly arrogant Son-of-a-Bîtch should have stopped a bullet YEARS ago! My contempt for him and his high-handed, autocratic methods knows no bounds, BECAUSE he so obviously holds all of US –– the great American Public –– in utter contempt.

    The worst aspect of the deplorable situation is that OBAMA DOESN'T CARE a FIG about ANY of it. His entire presidency, –– if such it may properly be called ––, has been All About HIM –– and NO ONE ELSE.

    When "divas" at the Metropolitan Opera went out of control with unbridled conceit, THEY got FIRED no matter HOW "popular" they were with the opera-going public.

    When you act like an ASS, you should be TREATED like an ASS. And Obama is most decidedly an ASS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FT, don't hold back, tell us how you really feel!

      ;^)

      Delete
    2. I'll try to do better next time, Warren. I promise.

      };^]>

      Delete
  2. I love the poster and have shared it with many. It sort of reminds me of when high profile scumbags (the Clintons)tried to abscond with National Treasures belonging to the White House. BTW, where are all of the @$$#0!&$ who kept telling us that the Pig In A Pantsuit was going to return there? Has anyone heard how much it will cost to fumigate the White House or will they just have to raze it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jon,
      I'm not sure where I found that poster -- either on Twitter or on Facebook, though.

      Please share any graphics you find here at this blog.

      Delete
    2. If I were moving in, I'd have all soft material removed and replaced. Carpeting, drapes, beds, the whole enchilada. Then I'd leak pictures of it happening.
      Then I'd have the place covered in those heavy canvas tarps and have the rest of if fumigated.
      I simply wouldn't be comfortable in there any other way and I'm serious.

      Delete
    3. I predict Donald Trump will set 'man made climate change' on its ear over the next 4 years.

      You have to be a complete moron to believe in man made climate change. The Earth was a snowball 15-18,000 years ago - why did it warm?

      Or maybe you have to be a Tweenie who thinks they are geniuses. Yea, here's a real pack of geniuses.

      Delete
    4. "You have to be a complete moron to believe in man made climate change." It's a reasonable interpretation of the evidence. In fact, it is difficult to interpret the evidence any other way; CC deniers tend to reject the evidence. This is psychologically difficult unless you're already paranoid.

      "why did it warm?" Good question! Here's an important preliminary one "how quickly did it warm?"

      As far as we can tell, human civilization did not become advanced back when the earth was on average 3 degrees cooler than it is now. How comfortable would such a change, in either direction, be now?

      Delete
    5. "You have to be a complete moron to believe in man made climate change."

      Yes and "you have to be a complete moron to believe" that this fraud leaves anything positive in his, so called, legacy! His "legacy" is nothing more than evidence of mass insanity on the part of the American Electorate!

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    7. Well, if you do believe in "man's involvement in Climate Change" and it's necessarily a bad thing, how about getting rid of man? In so doing YOU should set a good example and be the first to go!

      Delete
    8. Sorry Jon, I'm tired of them too. That one is banned and had to go but you got the relevant part in so it doesn't look like you're talking to yourself.

      They sound like Dr Suess, Horton Hears a Phrenologist. They don't even think that a unfalsifiable precept is a bad thing for rational discourse. That's why they accuse us of heresy. (They are fanatics!)

      Delete

    9. Thanks Warren,

      Have you noticed that Nostradumbass,AKA Canardo, hasn't appeared on this thread? Could it be that he recognizes his irrelevance? OK, probably not but who cares.

      Delete

  3. Crooked Hillary claims hostile people tried to influence the election. Yeah right, Madonna Lena Dunham, George Clooney, Jennifer Lawrence Olivia Wilde, Alec Baldwin, Bon Jovi Beyonce, JayZ, Whoopi Goldberg, and Samuel Jerkson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +2 Tom, Yea, the hostile people are the libtards.

      Delete
  4. I agree with the statement in your image. Started No class - ended less class. Both of them.

    SO - Why have he Dems not mentioned WikiLeaks ?? Do you think Wikileaks may have had somethng to do with the release of genuine true information about the evil of the DNC and the clintons, et al ?

    It's like when they attacked Joe the Plumber (Oh He's not got a plumbers license - so WTF does that have to do with obama's comment about stealing your money and giving it to losers?) I hate libtards. They're stupid and they try to exceed stupidities limits by the minute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kid,
      Why have he Dems not mentioned WikiLeaks ?? Do you think Wikileaks may have had somethng to do with the release of genuine true information about the evil of the DNC and the clintons, et al ?

      Yep!

      The Dems don't want to call attention to Wikileaks and are doing their best to relegate the Wikileaks information to Fox News.

      BUT...

      Most Americans today have computers, tablets, SmartPhones -- and even combinations thereof. Americans have learned not to rely on the media.

      Delete
    2. Maybe I'm wrong, but didn't the Dems adore Wikileaks when information about the GWB administration was being released?

      Delete
  5. I would say "God bless Sheriff David Clarke," were it not for my perception that he is "Doing a Megyn Kelly" –– i.e. deliberately striking a POSE in order to gain lots of media attention in hopes of launching a more ambitious political or administrative career.

    Something to think about ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FT,
      Time will tell about Sheriff David Clarke.

      I don't see him all that much on television because I'm not watching much TV these days, but when I have seen him, he has seemed sincere.

      Delete
  6. Keep your post open for an addendum, I am sure you will be able to add a whole lot more of his evil doings before he is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bunkerville typed in:

    Keep your post open for an addendum, I am sure you will be able to add a whole lot more of his evil doings before he is gone.

    Commenters should add related links in the comments section here!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Valerie Jarrett has declared that the Obama Administration has been scandal free.

    Hold.

    The.

    Phone.

    See Obama's 'Scandal-Free' Administration Was Actually Riddled with Scandals. Worth reading!

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Russians did not do the hacking. But even if they had, the truths of the emails would not have been altered.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:
1. Any use of profanity or abusive language
2. Off topic comments and spam
3. Use of personal invective