Header Image (book)

aowheader.3.2.gif

Friday, April 1, 2016

The Words Which Must Not Be Uttered

1984's Newspeak in 2016

From WH Censors French President Saying ‘ISLAMIST Terrorism’:
The White House website has censored a video of French Pres. Francois Hollande saying that “Islamist terrorism” is at the “roots of terrorism.”

The White House briefly pulled video of a press event on terrorism with Pres. Obama, and when it reappeared on the WhiteHouse.gov website and YouTube, the audio of Hollande’s translator goes silent, beginning with the words “Islamist terrorism,” then begins again at the end of his sentence.

Even the audio of Hollande saying the words “Islamist terrorism” in French have, apparently, been edited from the video.

According to the official White House transcript of Hollande’s remarks, Hollande refers to “Islamist terrorism.” The audio of the bold text in brackets is missing from the video – the only point in the video [where] the audio is absent
Here's the video, with Hollande's comment censored:


The translation of the words which disappeared from the audio translation of the video:
Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq. We therefore have to act both in Syria and in Iraq, and this is what we're doing within the framework of the coalition.

38 comments:

  1. Wouldn't want those good, trustworthy and patriotic American Muslims getting offended and running off to make jihad against the west...


    Stop and ponder how absurd that argument is. If it is true, then we are fools for letting in people with such childish and violent proclivities that they cannot control.

    During all the Northern Ireland violence, we regularly heard and used terms like "protestant gangs" and "Catholic terrorists," and very few protestants or Catholics here ran off to Ireland in anger to join the fighting...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SF,
      Good point about Northern Ireland!

      Delete
    2. I could point you to any number of bars in Charlestown that were raising money to run guns for the IRA during the troubles.

      Delete
    3. Duck,

      True enough, but the point stands. Protestants and Catholics didn't become unhinged at the attachment of violence to their religion. They didn't run off to join the violence, they didn't turn on the nation, burn down the news outlets or go on killing rampages in their places of employment because their religion was disrespected.

      See the difference, cochise?

      Delete
  2. DIDADIN

    Detain
    Intern
    Disempower
    And
    Deport
    Islamaniacs
    Now

    D-I-D-A-D-I-N!

    Those who would be kind to the cruel are sure to be cruel to the kind."


    "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."

    ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

    DIDADIN!

    There is only ONE sensible solution to ALL forms of Islamic Aggression. and that is a UTILITARIAN solution –– a FINAL Solution:

    DIDADIN

    Detain
    Intern
    Disempower
    And
    Deport
    Islamaniacs
    Now

    D-I-D-A-D-I-N!

    Those who would be kind to the cruel are sure to be cruel to the kind."


    "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."

    ~ Thomas Paine (1737-1809)

    DIDADIN!

    However illegal, impolitic, inadvisable, unconstitutional, un-American, immoral or impracticable others claim it to be we should maintain a position of absolute intolerance for a Muslim Presence in OUR world.

    When the Handwriting on the Wall sends a clear, uncompromising message, and STILL we fail to heed its stern warning, we DESERVE to be ECLIPSED.

    FACE IT: Either it's DIDADIN or BE DAMNED.

    ____________________________
    ISLAM is a CANCER. 

Like any form of the dread disease it must be treated with AGGRESSIVE ATTACKS –– 

POISONED to DEATH with CHEMOTHERAPY -– 

BURNED to DEATH with RADIATION –– 

or CUT OUT SURGICALLY and DISPOSED of as the HAZARDOUS WASTE it is.

Anyone who does not believe this is an IMBECILE.

    _______________________
    

CANCER cannot be dealt with DIPLOMATICALLY.

CANCER cannot be REASONED out of EXISTENCE, it must be PHYSICALLY DESTROYED.
    IMMERSED, HAMSTRUNG, and DROWNING in MYRIAD bits of DATA as always instead of getting to the ROOT, DIGGING it OUT, and BURN ING it.

Any attempt to be "REASONABLE" about the dire THREAT ISLAM poses to DECENT PEOPLE everywhere in the WORLD is a complete WASTE of TIME and ENERGY. 

When it is clearly a KILL or BE KILLED situation, only a FOOL would FAIL to mount as strong and vicious a COUNTERATTACK as may be mustered. 

If the WEST is to SURVIVE, __ I-S-L-A-M __ M-U-S-T __ D-I-E.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AOW: To my post on the explosion of radical Islam in Europe and the danger it represents to multicultural, politically correct suicidal left wing fools in this country I have added a new link to a column by Amir Taheri examining the history of the left's "fetish" for radical Islam: http://mikesamerica.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is so extreme I cannot fathom any positive explanation for it. I live in an extremist town where idealogues are driven to do just this kind of stunt. I see it often. They cannot stand some reality and just pretend ... it does not exist. The only other explanation would be on such an order of betrayal I can hardly frame the thought of willful aid to an enemy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Baysider,
      The White House is now claiming that there was a technical glitch.

      Such that only that one short portion was lost on the audio? I don't buy it!

      Delete
    2. More information:

      According to MRCTV:

      After MRCTV reported that the White House posted video muting out audio of French Pres. Francoise Hollande and his translator saying the words, “Islamist terrorism,” the White House posted an explanation claiming “a technical issue with the audio during the recording” caused the lost audio – but, then, somehow, posted a link a version of the video without the recording “technical error.”

      Delete
  5. I just had breakfast with a friend who was working in a high level position at SHAPE until he rotated back a couple months ago.
    It is so bad. He's glad his family is out.
    He lost friends in Brussels.
    And the extent of the victims has been underreported because of their positions so as not to recognize the level of damage done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ed,
      the extent of the victims has been underreported because of their positions so as not to recognize the level of damage done

      I've been thinking that all along!

      After the Boston Marathon jihad attack, we heard and saw a lot about the victims who survived. After Paris, San Bernardino, and Brussels, we have not heard or seen much about the survivors.

      This information about the four children of Lieutenant Colonel Kato Martinez and his wife Gail (killed in the Brussels attack) has finally surfaced:

      All four children suffered severe burns. On initial survey of burns, a “rule of nines” is used to determine how much intravenous fluid to administer over the first twenty-four hours of care. If facial burns are noted, rapid sequence intubation is usually required to maintain a patent airway.

      Further down the road: the removal of eschar and the long slow process of skin grafts and physical therapy.

      [...]

      Daddy is in the ICU. The children are severely burned. Mom is dead.

      Please take a moment and enter “children with facial burns” into a search engine.

      View a few images. Imagine the Martinez children lit up like human torches. And as you imagine the same, view the calm nonchalant looks on the faces of the Brussels bombers as they pushed their Mother of Satan bombs into the Brussels airport.

      Think there is no real hell? Tell that to the Martinez family....


      Read the rest HERE.

      Delete
  6. The suicidal West:

    Red-carpets laid out for Islam hate preachers at universities and NO-ONE challenges them.

    Excerpt:

    A report found 27 events had radical speakers in just four months, a rise of 35 per cent over the last year.

    The shocking revelations come despite new legislation introduced last year requiring all universities to comply with the Government programme, Prevent, aimed at tackling extremism.

    But most events went ahead as planned despite no one challenging the views spewed by the speakers....


    Read the rest at the link.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you seen these "cultural suicide" machines?

      Delete
    2. Think we can make one with free "Quran's" inside? ;)

      Delete
  7. I had mentioned the Last English Prince column to my friend yesterday as part of our discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Minister of propaganda is very busy these days.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Obama continues his crusade against Islamic terrorism by cowering under his bed. Editing the speech of our ally is him sticking his fingers in his ears shouting "I can't hear you".

    ReplyDelete
  10. Duck,
    What, does Kid's outspokenness scare you?

    ReplyDelete
  11. No, that's kid.

    His recent solution to the opiate epidemic is to "let them die".
    Very deep thought.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Duck,
    Are you banned at Kid's site? You're sniping.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Everything that properly could and should be said about islam in the West is said at this link:

    http://freethinkesblog.blogspot.com/2015/01/blog-post_9.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you are over estimating your post, FT.

      It's hardly all inclusive.

      Delete
  14. Yes, I'm banned.

    But I think that looking at the opiate epidemic without even mentioning oxycontin and the changes in pain killer prescribing is indicative of a shallowness in other areas.

    Yet, we're the "libtards"?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Unreal, but then how stupid does someone have to be to not see islamic mohammedans as the major problem today. Vermin street gang POS's that they are.

    ReplyDelete
  16. All drugs were legal in the early 1900's. Coca-Cola was made and advertised to be made with cocaine. Opium dens were legal. Somehow America excelled and made it.

    The Government decided it couold make massive amounts of money by criminalizing drugs. And it has. People like duck need to put more thought into the goings on in a free society.

    If we're going to go the route of attempting to save people from themselves, there are a million more activities that people get involved with than drugs that are dangerous. Should we not regulate those activities aa well. See duck, that's where you libtards fall short on your thinking or non thinking as the case is here.

    If you ever said something intelligent, I'd let it slide at Kid's place, but you never have. It's all been spittle mouthed leftie attacks without the slightest morsel of defense for position.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So, duck, do you support - supporting the weakest individuals in society survive and procreate? Do you also support evolution? You can't have it both ways. Evolution only is valid if you let the weak die so that the strong can spawn the future. You realize that right? Or no?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Kid,
    The Government decided it couold make massive amounts of money by criminalizing drugs. And it has.

    On several levels. Entire probation bureaucracies have been created -- all funded by the taxpayers, of course.

    Furthermore, labeling addiction an illness has brought the problem onto the backs of all those who pay healthcare premiums. I wonder if fewer have gotten the monkey off their back now that treatment programs are funded by those who are not addicts.

    Look. I've known some addicts who kicked their habits. And without the standard 12 step programs, too.

    One major problem with 12 step programs is their built-in "doctrine" that relapse is to be expected and that the addict should blame himself much for having relapsed.

    Nobody quits drugs without hearing angel wings -- in which case a treatment program isn't required.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:
1. Any use of profanity or abusive language
2. Off topic comments and spam
3. Use of personal invective

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

!--BLOCKING--