Please note in advance. I am pro life and believe in life at inception. That's me.
Having said that. I would really like the Court to overturn it for one reason.
The Court enacted a law with their ruling just as they did in the Yonkers school desegregation case. They created law mainly because the legislatures refused to do their jobs, right or wrong to enact a new law.
I would hope the Court if it does overturn it would point out that main fact. It was a mistake and throw it back to the loonies in Congress and have them do their job.
We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion: 1. Any use of profanity or abusive language 2. Off topic comments and spam 3. Use of personal invective
Please note in advance. I am pro life and believe in life at inception. That's me.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that. I would really like the Court to overturn it for one reason.
The Court enacted a law with their ruling just as they did in the Yonkers school desegregation case. They created law mainly because the legislatures refused to do their jobs, right or wrong to enact a new law.
I would hope the Court if it does overturn it would point out that main fact. It was a mistake and throw it back to the loonies in Congress and have them do their job.
Inception? LOL!
DeleteJust wondering how these 10 facts would play a role in the incest and rape arguments.
ReplyDeleteAnd now that it appears that the political dogs have finally caught this car they’ve been chasing for decades, what are they going to do with it?
Sounds like they'll be legislating from the State Legislatures instead of the Courts for a change.
Delete