Header Image (book)

aowheader.3.2.gif

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

The Hillary Clinton Story



Why is it that so many think that it's Hillary Clinton's turn to sit in the Oval Office? Her long history of deception and duplicity goes way back and continues now as well:





Additional information to add to the Hillary Clinton story:

1. Hillary Clinton to give her private email server to Justice

2. CLOSE CLINTON aides now being investigated over ‘TOP SECRET’ emails Hillary denied she sent!

[with thanks to Jon Berg for the first video and to Mustang for the second video in this blog post]

46 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Ed,
      I just checked my in-law's FB page. I don't see anything right now about how wonderful Hillary is.

      I want to see my in-law's reaction as she has been lauding Hillary ever since the latter announced her candidacy.

      Delete
  2. Only liberals could possibly entertain the thought of this woman in the office of the presidency....I am not sure they've ever heard the phrase "too much smoke not to be any fire."
    This woman is definitely SMOKIN'...........as is everybody who respects her. But that's a different kind of smokin'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Z,
      Only liberals could possibly entertain the thought of this woman in the office of the presidency.

      And not all liberals, either.

      Do you think that Hillary will be the 2016 Dem candidate for POTUS?

      If not Hillary, could the Dem ticket be Biden/Webb?

      Delete
    2. Hi...Not sure Webb is lib enough, but that might be the plan; it's looking like folks are really questioning the liberal agenda right now since it isn't working so spectacularly.
      I just can't imagine Biden running with all the gaffes and all....but, even I think anybody but Sanders is better than Hillary

      Delete
  3. David Petraeus' " unauthorized removal and retention of classified information" resulted in a federal judge sentencing him to two years probation and a $100,000 fine. Now, about that email server!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Finntann,
      Excellent point!

      Of course, the powers that be wanted him drummed out. Therefore, he was.

      Delete
  4. She can deny she sent the TS e-mails all she likes...the digital chain of custody won't lie for her. However, it remains to be seen if the information cited within those e-mails was properly classified initially. If spillage occurred unbeknownst to her, and she sent improperly marked information...she has cover.

    If she sent information over an UNCLASSIFIED server, that she knew [by nature of her security clearance and need to know] that said information exceeded that server....she should be held punitively liable and be prohibited from being granted any future security clearance.

    Sadly, a clearance is not required to be POTUS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CI,
      If spillage occurred unbeknownst to her, and she sent improperly marked information...she has cover.

      Legally, yet. But even with cover, her credibility will have suffered more damage, IMO.

      Delete
    2. Hopefully, I don't think Hitlery Clinton will make it - that is if we keep all of her many scandals alive in 2016. Her e-mails and the "Charity Contributions from foreign governments are just the tip of the scandal iceberg. Hillary is as big a liar as Obama and a Hillary presidency would be as big or worse of a disaster to this country than Obama's.

      Delete
  5. What possible reasons could Hillary have had to be using that private server in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fundraising.
      And whether it was wrongly classified, it's still illegal to treat it as if it wasn't.

      Delete
  6. Does Madam Hillary actually not know she is lying? Is it intentional? Either way it looks that way...

    ReplyDelete




  7. The Hildabeast is in some deluded state of greatness seems to think the American public is buying her lies such as landing in Bosnia under fire, and the list goes on and on and on... The democrats are NOT drinking plain old Kool-Aid, anymore. Now, their drinking Hillary's Douche Water. Because it takes an extra level of stupidity to look past the LYING, the STEALING, and the INFLUENCE PEDDLING.
    She "claims' to be fighting for women. What women?
    The ones who her husband raped? The ones who let him stick cigars in them? The ones she should have had the character and spine to stand up to by dumping that sexual predator of a husband over? The ones that were taken advantage of because they were young & stupid?
    And yet some of brain-dead progressives can't wait to vote for her because you're dumb enough to believe she believes the nonsense, and the LIES that she spouts.
    She placed her own power hungry ambitions ahead of ANY moral choices. It shows that unethical conduct is tolerated in YOUR hypocritical party. Scandals are becoming a trend in YOUR hypocritical party. Hillary is not changing anybodies mind, except those who are looking for more Free Stuff, or her Hypocrisy about forgiving student debt, or Free tuition, or some new “freebie”giveaway, or who are used to buying crap from Snake-Oil salesmen.

    And these are the same folks that call Trump names, and make fun out of his hair!
    His Hair? Give us a frikken break!

    Deal with it, the Hildabeast is toast.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AOW:

    Your question, "Why is it that so many think that it's Hillary Clinton's turn to sit in the Oval Office?" ...

    ...contains its own answer: "Her long history of deception and duplicity goes way back"

    Unfortunately, deception and duplicity seem to be the top two qualifications for higher office.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I do think character matters. Common criminals, liars, like Hillary seem they should be disqualified by popular consensus. Seems Hillary has proven to be the exceptions to the rule.

    Being honest isn't a requirement either.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bernie Sanders has beenis drawing bigger crowds than Hillary and his followers are more vocal then Hillary's. Everybody has been saying Trump shot his wad to early but more and more it looks like Hillary is the one suffering from pre-mature election.

    About 19,000 people cheered Sanders in the arena that is home to the NBA's Portland Trail Blazers. The rally had originally been scheduled at Veterans Memorial Coliseum, which has a capacity of about 12,000, but was moved in anticipation of large crowds.

    A lot of people on this board have talked about how Obozo has polarized this country including myself. What better proof of that then the rise of Trump and Sanders? The 2016 election COULD prove to be the most decisive and attended and voted election in this country ever.

    Hillary may need her Communist/Socialist base she does not have much left but her welfare addicts. Hillary has a big problem, she can't win by staying out of the public eye, and hiding from the press much longer. Sooner or later she is going to have answer the tough questions... and she’s not used to that. I think that she has a lot more problems then the media is telling.

    How does anyone run for office when being investigated by everybody? Besides I don't think Obama trusts her let alone likes her.
    1) He has not endorsed her yet
    2) The AFL-CIO put off endorsing anybody.
    I think they are all waiting for Biden to make up his mind, and I use the word “mind” very generously .

    So it all boils down to a political party whose candidates for president include two men (assuming Biden runs) one with decades of service to big government, and another who is an admitted Socialist, and a woman who is as corrupt and deceptive as anyone can possibly be?

    ReplyDelete
  11. If Clinton batted about information which belonged within a SCIF (Secure Compartmented Information Facility) that is BIG news. Regardless, even at my place of employment, I cannot send e mails which belong in official capacity status from my home computer. Everything, must reside within facility chain of command, infrastructure and software environ.

    If SCIF level information was not encrypted, this is quite a bit worse than Sandy Berger stuffing intelligence reports in his underwear. At least, the Chinese did not have access to it when compartmented in his underwear and his socks.

    "Gave" her e mail server to the FBI? I doubt it. The authorities gave Hillary the dignity of offering it as opposed to seizing it with a warrant in hand. You and me? They would break down the door at three a.m.

    I consider Hillary to be deeply dishonest. A nice forensic search of her sheenanigans is obviously in progress.

    Tammy

    ReplyDelete
  12. AOW, I just finished reading a nicely provocative, and wonky, article regarding Clinton's use of a private server and classified information.

    http://journal.ijreview.com/2015/08/246430-im-a-former-u-s-government-it-professional-hillary-clintons-email-actions-flirt-with-treason/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CI,
      Thanks for that link. I appreciate your taking the time to provide that information.

      Delete
    2. CI,
      I just finished reading that article. Excellent!

      Delete
    3. Just another right winger whining about Benghazi.

      Don't care for Clinton? Support a Sanders and hope it's
      not too late to find a Republican candidate who hasn't completely alienated moderate women, blacks and latinos.
      There's a proven constituency out there that you seem intent on alienating.

      It doesn't do any good when you start throwing around terms like "treason" as if that resonates with anyone not on the fringe.
      The article reduces to Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi.

      Oh, and they replaced a bunch of people in the White House travel office.
      Very weak tea that will not resonate with many out there.

      She's talking about an issues like student debt (thanks to Bernie) that will resonate with younger voters and you're responding with Benghazi,Benghazi,Benghazi .

      That's why you are going to lose.

      Delete
    4. Duck,
      You do yourself a disservice by pronouncing winners and losers this far in advance of the 2016 Election.

      Quack all you like. The reality is that at this point Hillary's future as the Dem candidate is in serious trouble -- and in more than one way.

      Delete
    5. The Beantown Quacker's got a Benghazi fixation. He's a quacking broken record.

      He's also got a huge blind spot when it comes to his hero Hellary, the women with as much White House experience as the chef, the woman clinging to the coattails of a pedo-rapist, the woman peddling influence and selling access to the US government via the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Foundation.

      Yeah, that's who we need as president. It's an intelligence test, Ducko, and you flunked.

      Delete
    6. Hey, Freethinke, I'm with Sanders all the way.

      Given what you are offering on the right, you do, however, make her a viable candidate.

      Delete
    7. It's telling how Ducky would not only ignore, but support - preferential treatment under the law......only when it's a personality form his ideological camp, of course.

      Don't worry Ducky.....Hillary is the political elite. She won't be held to the law like us plebs would be. Interesting that you support that.

      * AOW - apologies for the dual commenter names....since switching to WP, I've had a helluva time commenting on Blogger with my WP creds.

      Delete
    8. No, it's not that she shouldn't be held to the law.
      I think this will damage her and can't say it isn't welcome.

      What I am also saying is that the right will screw it up because they are functionally unable to get off their ridiculous Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi hobby horse.

      Treason, are you s****ing me?
      What will happen on the right as it usually does is they will over reach and in this case Clinton will escape answering because you'll turn it into a rabies radio sideshow.

      Come back in a couple months and tell me I'm wrong.
      Meanwhile, if you want to abandon the elite, try Bernie Sanders.
      He's very lenient on gun legislation so he covers a big part of your platform right there.

      Delete
    9. What difference does it make?

      Delete
    10. Duck,
      We don't yet know if the Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi hobby horse is ridiculous.

      That a silly YouTube "film" was blamed for what happened in Benghazi was a lie. Why would such a lie have been constructed in the first place?

      What will happen on the right as it usually does is they will over reach and in this case Clinton will escape answering because you'll turn it into a rabies radio sideshow.

      We shall see. You may not have a feel for the tenor of the nation outside the area in which you live.

      Delete
    11. Ducky, I partially agree with you...the GOP is more often than not, it's own worst enemy. But this issue is not tied to Benghazi [your projection fetish aside].

      Surely you jest about Sanders? While his position on the 2A has been mildly less oppressive than his peers, he has taken the predictably mindless course on this issue, shared by others who do not value civil liberties. Sander shall not be earning my vote.

      I default to the LP candidate, unless shockingly surprised by a choice from the GOP. That doesn't happen often.

      Delete
    12. I intend to register myself, my cat, and a few hundred dead relatives as Democrats and vote for Bernie Sanders in the Democrat primaries.

      Then I will vote for the Libertarian candidate in the general election.

      Delete
  13. It's now up to the FBI to find out who might have actually deleted TOP SECRET off many of the emails......Huma Abedin? Whoever takes that off then can send it to anyone they want to.

    Funny to watch the White House run this whole thing...it's a wonder they can do so much damage to America and still find time to bat Hillary around; after all, the NYTimes exposed this email thing, not the Right.
    The NYTimes is in bed with Obama, Obama and the Clintons supposedly can't stand each other........
    It'd be fun to watch the Leftists squirm if they weren't dealing with the future of America, wouldn't it?

    Ben Carson is attracting more and more; who knew good character would still attract many Americans? GOod news!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think that what Bill Clinton did and how Hillary defend him and "stood by him" was reprehensible... I feel very comfortable with giving my vote to Donsld Trump rather that to a person as dispicable as Hillary Clinton.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Kitty Panne says

    Hillary most is n most desperate need of a competent Fashion Adviser.

    She should NEVER wear large prints, especially HOUND'S TOOTH CHECKS.

    UGH!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who cares about that?
      Not me!

      Delete
  16. Just a Guy from JerseyAugust 13, 2015 at 9:44:00 AM EDT

    LOL! I hate Trump. I'm just letting him talk and enjoying the hypocrite, and waiting until he tottaly hangs himself, and he will He and his ilk have done far worse than Hillary ever did. They created him. Trump is a natural consequence of the low-brow pandering of the right wing punditry.
    Pass the Popcorn please

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hillary has apparently handed over a blank server. I saw this information just now at Weasel Zippers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. See this link:

      http://www.weaselzippers.us/231559-hillary-handed-over-blank-server-to-fbi/

      Delete
    2. A blank server is either new in the box, or wiped clean.

      Delete
  18. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were walking down the street when they came to a homeless person. Trump gave the homeless person his business card and told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person.

    Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless person, she decided to help too, and walked over to the homeless person and gave him directions to the welfare office. She then reached into Trump 's pocket, got out $20. She kept $17 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless person $3.00.

    ReplyDelete
  19. About the company that Hillary used to maintain her private server:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3197093/Tech-company-maintained-Hillary-s-secret-server-sued-illegally-accessing-databases-creating-chaos-stealing-White-House-phone-numbers.html

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Bottom Line is, should we elect a person who doesn’t know what a classified document looks like if they receive one? Or is she too damn DUMB to know that!
    I can think of a million reasons to NOT vote for her, but this is just too much!
    Lets face it she's was too dumb to know that her own Husband was cheating on her!
    Doesn't matter to me. If They were marked. or They weren't marked, If I were at the level supposedly Hillary was at I would know what a top secret document looked like
    This gal didn't even go back to the source and say,"Hey this looks pretty sensitive, should it be floating around like this?"

    Secretary of state, former senator, and she doesn't know what a secret document looks like. Sorry, this smells worse than the stink made by her husband. Hillary's brand of corruption stinks to high heaven, and the smell will overwhelm us if she is elected President. There will be scandal after scandal, as in the years her husband was President.

    ReplyDelete
  21. hilrod is human garbage, career mobster, doesn't pay taxes wiht the clinton foundations, on and on and on. Everything a libtard would complain about with a repub. So no doubt the beast is a shoe in.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil dialogue at Always on Watch. Comments that include any of the following are subject to deletion:
1. Any use of profanity or abusive language
2. Off topic comments and spam
3. Use of personal invective